Wednesday, 7 June 2023

The start of steelwork.

Friday on the steels.

Our first day of actual work on the steels for Broadway P2! We've got a lot of the angle iron lengths off the MACAW, and on Friday we sorted them into two piles, one for cutting and rewelding, the other to be cleaned and painted.

The shed was fairly busy on Friday, despite the absence of regular trains (a shunter did appear from Winchcombe, so 'no trains' doesn't mean 'no trains at all....')

Here are up to date pictures of our 3 GWR 2-8-0s, noted during a stroll through the main steam shed:

Our venerable friend 2807, with the boiler fitted.

3850, with new smokebox and cylinders.

2874, with new smokebox barrel.


The delicate manoeuvre of getting 6m lengths of angle through a 4m gap.


 

Before starting work on actual manufacture of canopy parts we had to take about 30 lengths of angle to the 'greenhouse' by the former garden centre site, which we have selected as a useful dry area for working in.

Sadly there is no room in the steam shed for us to have a working area.





When Neal had finished we repositioned the pallet of road salt, which had been left in the car park some months ago and which was rather unsightly there.

It is now at the end of the platform ramp, where it is closer to the place where it might be needed next winter.





Neal and John the started the actual manufacturing process. The first job was cutting and welding.

As we can't take the saw with us, we have to bring our lengths of angle to the saw.






At the same time back in the 'greenhouse' yours truly was charged with cleaning up the 30 or so angles, and then putting them in green primer.

Working most of the afternoon saw two lengths finished in green.

28 lengths to go.....





In the PWay yard Paul and Walt had a go at sorting out our jumbled pile of rubber crossing pads.

It was an opportunity to gain further experience with the RRV STEVIE. 



Sad to report but 15 months after purchase it is still unable to do anything on the track, the purpose for which we spent  money on its acquisition.

STEVIE remains confined to the yard. 




Saturday out with the gang.

Eight of us today, with some absences due to the half term holiday. But at least that was good for passenger numbers.



At 09.42 we had a surprise flypast by two Boeing Stearmans from Aerosuperbatics. We know one of the pilots well, so had a 4 minute warning of their arrival.


How to wave to them? We had the idea of using one of the new lookout flags.





And here they are! Our very own flypast. We were even saluted with a little puff of white smoke, and we waved back with great enthusiasm.


Fuel for machines, and fuel for volunteers.




Then it was time to pack up the tools and go. The destination today was Pry Lane bridge, where some unevenness was reported.





 

 

The Ranger, a Transit and the Telehandler with a bucket of fresh ballast reported for duty at Pry Lane.


We traced the unevenness to the area of the northern CWR breather, where there was a slight change in height on both sides. It appeared as if the tamper stopped by the breather, leaving a kind of step. 

Unfortunately we were not permitted to work for more than 20 minutes at a time (a train being in section outside that) and that was not enough to solve the problem.


While waiting for one of these 20 minute slots we did have the opportunity of photographing the 2MT from close by, and for once with the sun behind the camera.

So this is 78019, just after crossing Pry Lane.







To our surprise the train slowed, then squealed to a stop, and out of the cab came our own Bert Ferrule!

He must have friends in high places...






We then moved on to a location where we could work, which has half a mile further south, where recent tamping had left some shortages of ballast on the shoulders.

Thanks to Dave a bucket full of ballast was offered up to Bert, and it was relatively easy to shovel this sideways and along the shoulder that was short.

Others in the four foot cleared excess ballast off the sleepers.



We treated three locations with low shoulders, and before leaving for the Coffeepot we saw 78109 once again under a blue sky, this time passing us non stop as it rumbled over the occupation bridge at Peasebrook Farm.




Monday, out with a Transit.

Three of us took a Transit out to the Gretton straight, to pick up some of the 40 or so old sleepers left along the lineside.



 

 

Here we are at the start of the straight, picking up the sleepers from out of the brambles.






Nearby was this milepost.

It must be one of the least GWR type that we have. It looks as if it was fitted with a new number plate early on, using the original bridge rail post.

 

Our drainage gang have done an excellent job at replacing these yellow numbers with wooden GWR replicas. Look out for them, there are lots about already, but doing the whole of the 14m line at 1/4 mile intervals will take a certain time.







 

When we got back to the yard at Winchcombe we had a similar job unloading them. We just had to sort them into 'no hope', 'possible sale' and 'maybe re-use in a siding ' piles.






On the way back we called in at Broadway. News had reached us that a second B&Q type shed had indeed been placed in our carefully built 1904 era station.

Our mission is 'to build and maintain a railway museum for the benefit of the public' and it is very sad to see yet another shed erected along our line, after those already existing at Toddington, CRC, and very nearly at Winchcombe.

Worse still, the pub type picnic tables that used to fill this space have been pushed out, and relocated along the platform to sit in between our GWR heritage lamp posts.  A sponsor paid us £2000 pounds to have a pattern made, so that we could cast accurate replica GWR lamp posts for Broadway. What is the point of such attention to detail and dedication to our heritage if the effect is spoilt with modern additions placed all around them?





This is the cross platform view from 1904. 

Hexagonal lamp, wooden staircase, 'BROADWAY' running in board.




 

The 2023 view taken from the same angle:


Modern sheds and picnic tables now all along the platform.

The opportunity we strived for, to take a 1904 photograph just as it was, is now lost.






Wednesday with the Usketeers.

Just three of us today - Dave was on a holiday, and Jules had personal stuff to do. Yours Truly, Paul and John were on site. After a cold start, it became hot as the day progressed, and layers of clothing had to be shed as we went along.


 

 

The main job of interest today was to fit the union and stop ends that we ordered - a second time, the first proving to be of a different type of 'Ogee'.

Now we have two stop ends and a union left over, brand new. What to do with them?

In the picture is the second order, ready for fitting.





 

Here is Paul giving one end a good poking. The stop end fitted OK, albeit still not perfectly. Mysterious. But we were able to use it, with a  bit more sealant.




 

 

The guys from Construction & Maintenance came and very kindly helped us out with a bit of shovelling.


They filled the gravel run on the side nearest the camera, and backed up the temporary retaining boards with soil from the stuff that Dave delivered for us last week. A lot more is needed around here, but you can see what it is meant to look like. There is talk of a delivery of topsoil for our friends at C&M, but no one knows when. But we do need to get the grass seed in asap, otherwise the weeds will get there first.


 

 

 

Outside Churchward house our FD was just parking the company car....





 

 

So we fitted one of two stop ends. The second proved to be particularly difficult, as we could not drill the hole in the end of the gutter to hold it. Even a new, sharp drill failed to penetrate. Strange, that.




After several tries we gave up on the stop end, and started on the union. 

Here we decided to take down the gutter, put it on the ground and push down with our body weight. That worked.



 

With the holes properly drilled, Paul was able to get the union in, although the fit is still not ideal due to the slightly different Ogee shapes.

Next week Paul will have another go.




 

Lots of people keep wandering over for a little look. Engine crews, other departments, and today, the signalman - in between trains, obv.

He said that he had been watching the Usk hut grow, and how nice it looked from over there. So we asked if we could see for ourselves.




The first thing we noticed though was how well signalmen look after themselves....

That is a genuine GWR Hotels, Paddington cup btw. The cake is probably more recent though.

So this is the view of our little hut from the box. Better than the Bradstone houses behind, in any case.

Paul working on the gutter round the other side said at one point, go and get me the sealant gun, it's some where round the side, you'll find it OK.

We looked and looked and looked.

Can you see where it was?


Yes, this is the signalman's view, without all those bells and whistles in front.

It does have a certain charm about it, under that tree.


Now it's time to go home and have a shower. Ready for the big day tomorrow: Mrs. Blogger's birthday, a milestone. We are taking her out for a posh meal (since she says she doesn't want any presents. But they don't mean that, do they?)




21 comments:

  1. The new 'Shed' is another reason to have some sort of Heritage Coordinator to liase with the management so each Station can be consulted about changes. You and the Broadway group have done sterling work to get a period Station. This is being spoiled by incongruous additions not in keeping with the overall theme.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I agree with you entirely John.
    Perhaps the method might be to propose a motion at the AGM "To Establish a Heritage Committee with powers to safeguard the fundamental mission of the GWSR as a working railway museum and protect against any inappropriate activities".
    Are there any other shareholders or volunteers who agree with this suggestion?
    Please contact me on " pensarnroses@ gmail.com"

    ReplyDelete
  3. I also agree. Also, if there has to be A shed, and I emphasise A, (as in not multiples), it could at least be constructed to GWR design and would not then stick out like the proverbial 'sore thumb'.
    Hope you and 'She who must be obeyed' have good meal out. I quite agree with your statement, as when I asked my dear one, I was told "nothing; just something to open on the day!". So there we have it. And they say we men are weird!!
    Regards, Paul.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Theoretically, the railway does already have an organisation within its structure which has special responsibility for heritage - the Gloucestershire Warwickshire Railway Trust.

      According to the GWRT website, the Trust exists to "to maintain and develop a railway museum for the benefit of the public, buffer stop to buffer stop, fence to fence".

      In short, the PLC runs the railway, while the Trust builds the railway.

      So, in theory, the railway should automatically be built and maintained with heritage in mind.

      I say 'theoretically' and 'in theory' because, as we have seen, the GWRT doesn't really fulfill its brief. In fact the GWRT has been largely responsible for turning the railway into The Shed Line.

      The memorial shed on platform 2 at Toddington, which visually wrecks a corner of the station that in other respects has hardly changed since 1904, even displays a sign proudly proclaiming that it is 'Supported by the GWRT'.

      Frankly, with support like that, the railway doesn't need enemies!

      The memorial shed could have been placed in a less sensitive position - and it didn't have to be a shed. A restored box van would be a much more appropriate solution to providing a covered space to display memorial plaques, and as for the location - well, there's a bay platform at Winchcombe, near the faux-goods shed, where the van could be permanently stabled.

      I'm no expert in this sort of thing, but aren't there clear obligations on charitable organisations to do the job they're created to do - with penalties if they don't?

      It seems to me that the GWRT is in breach of its obligations. It's supposed to be the railway's heritage conscience - not working to undermine the identity of the GWSR as a heritage railway.

      But how to challenge it? I don't know.

      But presumably there are procedures....

      Delete
    2. Michael,
      I don't think we have met, but I endorse every word of your erudite post. I was, in part, responsible for bringing the "Usk Hut" to Winchcombe and I admire the skilled and dedicated, small team that have built a charming, heritage building in a sympathetic way. The brilliant canopy extension on Broadway P2 and so many other clever things.
      In answer to your penultimate question. There is a feeling that the directors are facilitators of a sensitive volunteer organisation. A convenient "opt out" philosophy. A heritage director or team, with strong but sympathetic executive powers, through which all projects should be channelled should be appointed. I believe Severn Valley Railway work this way.
      Fundamental.

      Delete
  4. Let's look on the bright side. We are assured this shed is only temporary "to gauge demand". Taking this at face value, unless it is not a success, in which case the shed goes, a more permanent solution will be required. Assuming the latter, it could be a good opportunity to construct something that can replace both sheds. Something based on the former parcels office at Henley-in-Arden just up the line, now preserved at Kidderminster www.svrwiki.com/Kidderminster#/media/File:Kidderminster_Parcels_Office_20150528.jpg would be very appropriate, and needn't be too expensive.
    A large version of the GWR tin hut could also be an option www.svrwiki.com/Kidderminster#/media/File:Kidderminster_Uffculme_Building_20150528.jpg or a couple of grounded van bodies could do the trick if none of those appeals. Plenty of possibilities that sit between a B&Q summerhouse and an expensive brick building, which seems to be the fear anytime anyone mentions 'heritage'.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hmm, sorry to engage cynic mode Alex but in my experience installations and measures that were promised at the time to just be "temporary" eventually turn into "permanent". David

      Delete
    2. You're not wrong, so I expect the initiative to replace it with something better will rest on those who wish to see it.

      Delete
    3. Are we not missing the point a little? If sales outlets are mandtory, cannot they be sited along the driveway with GWRlooking buildings to at least get them off the platform.
      Regards, Paul.

      Delete
  5. I thought a Heritage Committee was formed some years ago after some of the earlier arguments over Broadway. Surely it is in the Railway's interest to develop and protect the heritage aspects of the line and, in particular, Broadway, which is now a drawcard in its own right. It is understandable that not everybody, in every department, understands what is needed but if all work at Broadway had to be approved by a Heritage Officer or similar, it would avoid these faux-pas before they occur.
    Meanwhile perhaps somebody could investigate Alex's suggestions for potential replacements.
    Congratulations on the Usk hut. It looks really at home under its tree !
    I'm now looking forward to the completion of Platform 2, it has been a long time !

    ReplyDelete
  6. It's an unfortunate fact of life that Broadway is no longer a deserted, bucolic country station as it was in 1904, but the thriving terminus of a preserved railway, and this places demands of 2023, not 1904, on the location. The visitors, who help to pay the bills incidentally, demand facilities of today, including toilets, a cafe, and a shop. (Visitors who now by-pass Toddington have requested a shop, so I understand). The shop should have been where the cafe is now, but a strong campaign persuaded the Board of the day to change to a cafe on condition that Broadway supporters staffed it. I agree totally that the B&Q shed is not pretty, but surely when the ghastly building site on platform 2 is transformed into a glorious GWR building with expensive Edwardian bricks, the shop can go in there. Or are there other plans for it?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. My understanding is the shop is not wanted on P2 as it will garner less passing trade. I think it's generally accepted that Broadway cannot be a deserted station, but the thinking should always be "If the GWR had seen a need for X at the time, what might it have looked like?" That thinking worked well for the cafe - never one at Broadway, but if the GWR had built one there in 1904, what we've now got is not beyond the realm of imagination. If the GWR had seen the need for a small shop soon after they'd built the station, one of the options above would seem likely candidates. A B&Q summerhouse, probably not.

      Delete
  7. John,Mike, Paul, and ALEX, have a good look at the black and white photo of the Broadway horse dock. One of the important functions of the railway was to move men and materials during the first and second world wars. My grandfather on the French front for five years in WW1 saw thousands of horses destroyed. Wouldn't it be a fitting historical initiative to reinstate that horse dock with wagon as it was at Broadway. Something to explain to the public, school kids in the future ?
    Mike Rose.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'd be very much in favour of reinstating the horse dock, perhaps once P2 is done? It might even spur me into action to re-restore the only complete surviving GWR horsebox currently languishing at Winchcombe.

      Delete
    2. We have spoken to board directors about the long term goal of re instating the horse dock, using suitable vans so that the contents of the containers can be moved into them and the containers cleared. As Alex said the GWR Horsebox could be one of the items.
      Neal

      Delete
  8. What is the problem with the road-railer preventing its use on the track? HSE seem to have scuppered use of one bought for the S&D at Shillingstone station, with various prohibitively expensive alterations seemingly needed to make it compliant with their safety directive. Is this the same with that at GWSR?

    ReplyDelete
  9. The Edwardian Tearoom has been equally as good as Winchcombe in terms of profits thanks to loyal Broadway volunteers and a few others helping to run it .The cafe makes far more money than a shop but we must take advantage of the sales opportunities at both ends of the line where most visitors board and stay on the train .

    Lets hope the new larger waiting room on P2 can incorporate a shop and maybe a museum of items made available for the Broadway Museum display . Trains would need to come into P2 and allow passengers to see these benefits before crossing the bridge . A working signal box would add even more entertainment to promote this wonderful station for years ahead .

    Good to have a few options ahead at Broadway which is our jewel in the crown and so important in terms of future growth via tourists in the Cotswolds . We should not develop Toddington further despite the board's keenness to give the new non Executive Director something to do , as it already has enough attractions within it's location .JM .

    ReplyDelete
  10. ALEX,
    Please could you make one of your excellent, handwritten GWR notice boards. Title, "Broadway Phase 2", mount up some enlarged, black and white, laminated photos of how it used to be on P2. Photos of modern plan, artists impression. Dynamic piece of marketing blurb explaining future use, including signal box, with subtle reference to donations.
    Put the notice somewhere prominently on P1 for passing passengers.
    How about the same set up "Broadway Phase 3" and build the Horse Dock.
    Make Broadway station " The Jewel in the GWSR Crown!"

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I must admit I've been looking at the existing rather faded display boards at Broadway showing the amazing work done in rebuilding the station so far for some time and pondering, a 'Here's what's next' one too does appeal. As ever, comes down to time available, anyone else with graphic design skills please step forward! :-)

      Delete
  11. What is the point of going to all that trouble to make Broadway Station a heritage replica when the railway defaces it with a shed? The powers that be should have consulted widely and you never know what useful suggestions would have been forthcoming. A hedge to block off the view of the garage down the drive would also contribute to the atmosphere of Broadway. A replacement for the Trumpton signal box at Cheltenham would also be worthwhile

    ReplyDelete
  12. I can understand why any shop would need to be on P1, as opposed to over the bridge and far away, but as others have stated, what would the GWR have done? Under the circumstances, options are very limited, but maybe in the long term, something along the lines of the classic GW Pagoda, with dimensions to suit the shop's function?
    It can only be an improvement.

    ReplyDelete