Wednesday 21 December 2022

Last one this year

Friday clearing snow

A desperate appeal came from the Santa organisers - heeeeeelp! The Winchcombe platform is under 4ins of snow and ice, and the next day trains would be bringing happy children to see Santa. Please come and help clear snow - bring your own shovels.

18 people heeded the call. A pretty good result.

 

We know it's all going to melt on Sunday, but Santa services resume on Saturday, and it's forecast to freeze again overnight.

The 18 set to with snow shovels, garden spades and brooms.

Ice on the left, snow on the right.

Yours truly had a snow shovel left over from the big snow at the end of 2010. It worked fine, but it soon became apparent that under the snow was a layer of thin ice formed by trampled footprints that had solidified. So pushing the snow off was only half the job.


Here the platform edge has been swept, but you wouldn't know it. 

What to do?

We managed to find some rock salt in Evesham, so took the blue Transit down there to get 10 bags.

Lots of rock salt, ready to go.

The rock salt finally did the trick, melting the compressed ice, ready for the big arrival. We've still got a few bags in reserve in case something happens again overnight.


An icicle grows from a Mk1 coach.

After clearing the snow we were promised a mince pie and coffee as a reward.


Our just reward for clearing snow.

You had to be quick, it seems that the mince pies became available while we were at Evesham loading bags of rock salt. We just managed one of the last ones, and the dregs of the coffee. Phew!

In other news, a kind blog reader saw the difficulty we had with splitting the throughbolted sleepers to get the chairs off, and has offered us a brand new maul to help.

We hadn't come across this item before (we have had a restful, office based life....) so had to Google 'Maul' and came up with this result:

 
A splitting maul also known as a block buster, block splitter, chop and maul, sledge axe, go-devil or hamaxe is a heavy, long-handled axe used for splitting a piece of wood along its grain. One side of its head is like a sledgehammer, and the other side is like an axe.

And this is what the kind blog reader bought us:








 





As you can see, it's a robust sort of axe, but thicker, so that when you drive it into the grain, it splits the wood. You then hammer it further in. It's got a pretty decent handle too.

We're very grateful for this kind donation. We're looking forward to having a good go with it, but that will be later next year, as we have the relay at Didbrook next on our list. We don't think it will split concrete sleepers....





Tuesday, and new rail.

The whole day (after the storm) was spent on unloading new rail from a lorry which had come from London with 24 brand new rails - 8 bullhead, and 16 FBs. They are destined in part to replace lesser quality rail in the main line (releasing that rail for sidings) and in part to go into stock, as we currently have no reserves of rail at all. Everything we had to spare went into the extension to Broadway.

Unloading the lorry from London.

The rail was picked up using our new beam. It's safer, but also quite slow if operated by Telehandler. Another thing that slowed us up was that the order the rails were stacked was wrong for us - we wanted the BH on top, which is where it also was on the lorry. So the BH had to be taken off and stored temporarily on the ground, and later double handled and also put on the Elk wagon, now on top of the FB rail. It took pretty much all day, luckily in mild weather.



Although Tuesday is mid-week, there were Santa trains terminating at Winchcombe.


At Lunch time one of the locos comes up to take water and effect a crew change. The low sun gave a very wintery effect here, although all of the snow had by then gone.



At the end of the day all 24 tons were stored neatly on  the Elk, ready for use. Now it has to go back to Winchcombe.



We had a few hours at Broadway too.


 

 

 

We found Ben, a new volunteer in our C&W department, at work on the Synchronome clock in the booking office. It's not yet running correctly, and on hearing that a new volunteer at Winchcombe was a clockmaker we had a chat, and Ben was willing to share his expertise with us.

The clock runs OK, but the slaves were having their own ideas.... a fix for this conundrum was hoped for on Wednesday, as we close.





 

Sad news about our new Broadway canopy, the loud speakers have indeed been installed. They are in full view, and bright white, much larger than the  CCTV cameras that we painted light stone so carefully.


Hello? Can you hear me?

There's also a grey plastic junction box fitted, to add to the modernism.


At the other end the loudspeaker has been screwed to within a few feet of the 'E FINCH' worksplate that we had copied specially to get the right 1904 effect.

There is currently no mechanism to prevent anyone at all from altering our historic substance at will. Holes have been drilled through walls, plastic electrical cable fitted in plain view, door knobs changed for modern handles, internet transponders fitted to facades, shelving fitted to original rooms and an internal wall broken out are some recent examples that spring to mind. 

To cap it all, the loudspeaker in the top picture was fitted to that part of the new canopy that has just been submitted to the HRA for a heritage award. Let's hope they don't come and look.




Wednesday with the Usketeers.

Still no scaffolding, but we have some good news here. The GWR Trust, our supporting charity, have kindly agreed for us to have a budget of up to £5000 for scaffolding hire, and other jobs to make the hut ready for viewing by our visitors. This means that we can finally place an order with the scaffolding company, and with a bit of luck we might be able to kick off in the new year. The tarpaulin has been reasonably waterproof so far, but we don't want to chance it for too long. Also, we are very keen to get going with the slates that we have sorted out.

Having said that the tarpaulin was reasonably waterproof, it was sorely tested last night when heavy rain came down, for a lengthy period. There are only 4 or 5 little leaks, but those drips over a whole night make for a very wet floor in the morning.

The Usk hut first thing, during the rain.
12m squared? What's that in proper feet?

We wiped down what we could. It rained heavily all morning, and from inside it sounded very bad indeed, under that canvas. Once outside, it seemed more moderate.

It was just as well that we couldn't work outside, as on receipt of that budget from the Trust we needed some time together to work out an order with our local building supplies company. At the same time we had coffee and macaroons, so the time under the rain was not wasted.

Today was a normal operating Santa day. It's all week now, so close to Christmas. Here's a train just coming in from CRC with expectant children. Some of the older ones, we heard, felt that a visit to Santa was beneath them, but on leaving they opened their present and were heard to exclaim 'Oh, cool!'. So he's not such a silly old chap after all.


Our big tank engine 427 was out today (together with Foremarke Hall) and at the end of the year she's out of ticket, and we won't be seeing her for quite a while. The immediate plans for the loco are not known.


So enjoy these last few shots of the 2-8-0 at work. Here it is, about to set off for Toddington for a crew change and some water.

Despite the rain, we had quite a few jobs to do inside the hut.

One was to make the door fit properly, and also drill a hole for the bolt to go in. We're also looking for some pink coloured slabs for the floor, and despite the rain we thought a visit (by car) to the local reclamation yard might produce something. That proved to be on Christmas holiday already, but once in the car, we went on to Toddington to visit the garden of a supporter, who said he had some Ogee guttering that we could have.


Ogee guttering found.


 

That visit proved fruitful. We obtained several lengths, enough for our needs (about 10 linear metres) as well as some corners and some of the bits where the downpipes start. What we didn't have were any downpipes themselves - anybody got some for us? We could also do with some end stops.

The stuff isn't new of course. We will strip it and repaint it next year, perhaps a job for John. Yours truly took home a bunch of brackets to clean and paint, something to do over the holiday absence (we're back on Jan 4th)

The guttering is of the smaller section, not the larger. The Usk hut probably didn't have any originally, but we think it would be better not to let the water spatter back up against the walls.




 

After lunch the sun came out, and we couldn't resist having a try out with our new stuff. How would it work, where does it attach?

Dave trying on a bracket on the end of a truss.


Dave with a section of guttering - what would it look like?

The same supporter - his garden pretty much resembles a professional reclamation yard - also had a variety of door knobs, locks and window latches for us to look at, and perhaps gratefully accept.

Which one should we chose?
We have 1 1/2 original latches - the receiving plate on one of them is missing. The shinier example is a brand new brass one, but it is too small for us to use. The big black box is a fairly substantial rim lock for the door, and we decided that it was ideal. Unfortunately that too is missing its receiving plate (as well as any keys, but we don't mind that as we have a bolt). There's a pair of door knobs that will do just fine, although they will need a longer square spindle to fit both chunky rim lock and our chunky door. The big fat door knob is off a goods shed in Abergavenny we were told, but despite its authenticity we felt it was one door knob too many.


Here is a picture of one of the sash locks screwed back into place. Note the GWR inscription on one of the sides.


On our way back to the car to get some primer we saw Foremarke Hall grind to a halt with another load of happy children.

We hadn't seen that frame and reporting number before. Very nice it is.

We left mid-afternoon in glorious sunshine, at last. For the first time we closed and secured the door, and all the windows of course are also water tight. We have our budget from the GWRT now, a shopping list drawn up, and should be able to make a start on the roof mid January, if we can get the scaffolder to find a slot for us.

Here is one last picture of the Usk hut, to close our very successful year 2022 with. Soon it will be dark again, but 2023 will be bright!





Picture puzzle time:

We had an interesting chat with the son of a former member of staff at Honeybourne last week, and he very kindly allowed us to scan in some of the photographs that he had. Unfortunately for many there was little additional information to give. So we'd like to put two to our readers, perhaps you can say more?

The above picture, of staff at Honeybourne Junction, we think was taken in 1943. It is semi-official, as it was glued to a smart piece of cardboard, it's not just a snapshot. 

Can anybody put a name to some of the faces?




The other one of interest is this one. The GWR signal box is entirely made of wood and looks a lot like Broadway box, which was also made of wood as it stood on made up ground.

However, if you zoom into the name plate it reads something like ***E*** North Signal Box. There's a letter 'E' in the first word.

The box is likely to be within 20 miles of Honeybourne.


Any ideas, anybody? Where is it?





Fimally, this looks like the last blog of the year, what with the Christmas festivities this weekend. So we say thank you for our loyal readers and supporters, and wish you all a merry Christmas, and a prosperous 2023. It will be an exciting year, that is sure. The PWay have a big relay project going at Didbrook, a bridge will be waterproofed, and the Usk hut will be completed. Maybe more - we will reveal next time.

On that merry note, we sign off for today, and indeed this year !

Thanks for all your interest and support.




24 comments:

  1. Super blog, Jo, and a fitting end to the year, with the Usk hut being locked up for the first time. A question about the superb Honeybourne Junction photo- 1943?- were not station running in boards removed/ painted over for the duration? Something about its neatness, and the general age of the station staff suggests an earlier date.
    Those loudspeakers - I thought that speaker technology had advanced in the last few decades. They look like something from the 1980s. They really don't give a stuff, do they?
    Buckets. Probably not too far from your first words upon seeing them.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. There is a second, more informal photograph, the size of a matchbox, with three characters, and that is dated 1943 on the back. Hence my thought that the larger one, on the blog, is from the same time. I can show it next time.

      Delete
  2. Signal box - Moreton ?
    Great read thanks.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Hereford station used to have very old public address loudspeakers, somewhat like gramophone horns in appearance, but with a square, not curved, shape. At a guess I would say they were installed in the 1920s. They were still there in the 1960s.

    This 1963 photo of Hereford station shows them, albeit rather indistinctly. The photo is from the Facebook group Railways Along The Welsh Marches - it may or may not be visible to non-group members:

    https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=3367301666818819&set=g.1261750287625308

    Gramophone horn-type speakers with a similar look might be appropriate for Broadway. The tapering, flat-sided cone shape would be relatively easy to make, and it should be possible to fit the horns over the modern speakers. They might even improve the sound.

    There would be no need to ask anyone's permission to do this. After all, as we have seen with all the unsympathetic modifications to the Broadway building, nobody ever does ask first.

    But then, who would you ask? There isn't anybody. The GWSR has no Director Of Heritage. Sometimes, I frankly wonder if the GWSR has any directors at all.

    As I've observed before, the GWSR has no proper corporate structure. There is no clear chain of responsibility, staff to management, and no clear chain of authority going the other way, as there would be if the railway was a normal commercial enterprise.

    In a way that's understandable, given that the railway is run by volunteers, who ultimately can't be told what to do. It's necessary to tip-toe gently around them, letting them do what they *want* to do, or they'll simply stop volunteering.

    But this does mean that the railway ends up being run by a collection of semi-autonomous groups, all doing their own thing, very often without any communication between them, and with nobody in overall charge..

    This more or less works while all parties are working towards a common goal - even if that happens more by default than by direction.

    But sometimes, as we see with the way the integrity of Broadway is being deliberately damaged by hostile decision-making, the different groups actively work against each other. And there is nobody who can stop this happening, because there's nobody in charge.

    I think it's a silly way to run a railway. It's a silly way to run anything. I fear that sooner or later it'll blow up into a major conflict, or even be the cause of some sort of safety crisis.

    But while the railway is run as a haphazard free-for-all, why not take advantage of it? Just do whatever you want to do, regardless of any knock-on effects - everyone else does. So go ahead and hang those horns!

    ReplyDelete
  4. I look forward to reading your Wednesday blog. Over the years I have learnt so much from the blog about how a heritage railway operates. In relation to changes made to a station, shouldn't the station master be part of the decision making process? Then there would be at least one person who had a broad view of what was intended/needed. Otherwise perhaps there would be someone who would be willing to take on a heritage responsibility for each station on the line. As a bye-the-bye who gave permission to rebuild the Usk hut?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The Usk hut was endorsed by the plc, and a director helped to dismantle it. There was a budget too, but the undrawn balance disappeared in the Covid crisis. The Trust has now helped to restore the funding.

      Delete
  5. I agree with the Station Master having the final say on things heritage. When I worked for the SVR, the Station Master was also Yard Master and head of department with monthly meetings at Bridgnorth.
    Excellent blog.
    Merry Christmas to you all and a Happy New Year.
    Seasonal regards, Paul.

    ReplyDelete
  6. It's definitely not Moreton in Marsh signalbox. I wonder if it might be Evesham North? There were two boxes at Evesham until the plywood woner that's still in use took them both over. I've never seen a picture of Evesham North, and don't know what type of box it was. But the nameplate would fit.

    In the picture at Honeybourne, I have an idea that the man on the left is Harry Burrows, who started on the railway as a porter at Honeybourne and then Porter/Signalman at Weston sub Edge, and continuing on the railway right into the 1980s. Harry was one of the relief signalmen who taught me Moreton in Marsh in 1973 before I took-on there. True gentleman and what he didn't know about how to run a railway wasn't worth knowing

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks for that, just the sort of info we need. We too wondered about Evesham North, but couldn't find a picture of it. The letters could certainly match what you can see of the blurred picture.

      Delete
    2. Evesham North was a Type 7D - i.e. a brick building similar to Toddington, which is a Type 7B. The box in the photo is a Type 27, the timber version of the Type 7 (would need to see a wider view to determine the variant) More detective work required!

      Delete
    3. Dang! I had hoped you would be able to sort that one! I notice that Honeybourne north loop also had this type of wooden box, but the name in the picture doesn't look right for that.
      Pity - that would have fitted well.

      Delete
    4. I've done a bit more digging! Having enhanced and enlarged the photo as best as I can without losing too much resolution I've come to the conclusion that it is indeed Evesham North Box! The SRS Register shows it as a Type 7D, but the entry is also noted as 'Unconfirmed' so there's every chance that the entry is incorrect in that respect and it should be shown as a Type 27. Other details are: Opened in 1907, 29 levers. Closed on 9th March 1957 along with the South Box when they were both replaced by the current Type 37 'Plywood Wonder'

      Delete
    5. Thank you, Aardvark11. This is quality stuff! Perhaps we have here the only known picture of Evesham North...?

      Delete
  7. I wonder if that money from the Trust could be stretched further if the hire cost for the scaffolding were reduced? One way to do this would be to work on the hut two days a week for the time the scaffolding was needed. Otherwise, that expensive scaffolding is sitting there costing money for 6 out of each 7 days. I often thought about scaffolding costs when Broadway was being built - a similar situation, albeit work on 3 days a week I seem to remember. But perhaps there was a special deal with the scaffolders for Broadway?? Same applies to temporary fencing hire: Heras fencing doesn't come cheap if you have to hire it. It may be cheaper in the end to hire bricklayers for a shorter time than it take volunteers to build the same amount of walling, given the saving on hire costs? Broadway platform 2 refers here...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. We allowed a 2 month scaffolding period in our budget, plus a reserve. However, if push comes to shove we will work extra days if need be. But that is unlikely.

      Delete
    2. Just to say Jo. thank you for a year long and informative blog...you chaps have done a wonderful job on the Usk Hut...a fine job it will be when finished.

      Delete
    3. Thank you for your kind comments too, Michael. See you next year!

      Delete
  8. Could the 5k be used to actually purchase scaffolding as there must be more use for such equipment on the railway

    ReplyDelete
  9. We had the scaffolders over @ C&W to effect our roof repairs recently with the take down last week….perhaps it would have been cost effective to put up some for the Usk given they were here on site twice. Brilliant blogging with the right balance of facts and heritage observations.

    ReplyDelete
  10. I too was disappointed to see the ugly and distinctly non-heritage loudspeakers that have been fixed to the canopy.
    The volunteers who have erected the canopy and made sure it is a faithful copy of the original must be outraged to see such unsympathetic additions to their work
    I agree with Michael Johnson's comment that there should be a Heritage Director who speaks to, and takes advice from, the volunteers who look after the stations. This would ensure a consistent 'look' for each station, in keeping with the era displayed.
    John Fancote

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you John! You have found the right words again.

      Delete
  11. Lets get Jo on the board as Heritage Director or Gregg Wigg , both have the experience and desire to see our railway looking correct . There is so much to preserve and reconstruct for others to respect and enjoy .
    Happy New Year to all of us who love the Blogs . john M .

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. John, I agree with your suggestion.
      John Fancote

      Delete
  12. Happy New Year everyone. Thank you for such interesting and informative blogs throughout the year, you've done some brilliant work. Wishing you all an excellent 2023

    ReplyDelete