Thursday in Birmingham.
On a mission to recover a GWR platform lamp post. It was located, standing upright on a patio, in a back garden in Birmingham.
The post was one of two that lit the level crossing at Bentley Heath, not far from Solihull on the line from Warwick to Tyseley. When the crossing was modernised in the 1970s the current owner paid £1 for it (plus 8p VAT) on a firewood ticket, got it home, through the garage and out on the patio behind.
Bentley Heath Crossing |
Picture credit: Warwickshire Railways, with permission, and thank you.
Another, earlier picture that shows the post in situ can be seen here:
https://www.warwickshirerailways.com/gwr/gwrbh3927.htm
It's actually quite a big job to dig in a lamp post, lay an electrical cable, wire it up, to the lamp and to a switch in the house, so that never got done. It stood loose on the patio for years and years, and got totally covered in ivy. Eventually the owner came to the conclusion that it would be better off on a railway, and the canopy team was contacted.
We hastened up to Brum, with Neal's van (not the usual Transit) as we had discovered that an 8ft GWR platform post just about squeezes into his van, if you fold the front seat down and have a hole in the partition wall (which Neal does).
Here he is giving the post a little wobble to test it. Is it bolted down? No, it just stood there, but totally covered in thick ivy. It's been cleaned by the owner, except for the top, which was a bit too high up.
We laid the post down on the ground, and with a borrowed crowbar we managed to get the rest of that reluctant ivy off. It really was incredibly clingy.
From this picture you can see that we came prepared. We had a strap round the bottom end, and a piece of pipe through it, which enabled John and Neal to carry the heavy end up to the door.
While the post was not dug in (the good news) a house extension had been built across the garden access (the bad news), so that the post had to be manhandled though the new extension and then back out through the garage to the drive.
Neal came prepared, as he had a piano trolley, and that was perfect for the job of transporting it down the hallway.
(Picture by John Fancote)
You wouldn't think this was possible - a lamp post being trundled through a house on a trolley! But we did it anyway, and without a scratch too.
And take a seat in the front of my van - maybe not....
The picture does show just how rusty the post is. Worst we've ever seen.
The post came with some bits - the remains of the lantern. It has a rather nice, intact finial.
But what to do with the remains? Any takers?
Friday with the tamper.
The B&R tamper has been patched up (a computer issue remains - the drivers have been lost, any bright ideas how to get them back?) and was out along the line on Friday, with yours truly as PWay rep on board.
We kicked off at Toddington.
We found the tamper in the loco yard, got permission to use the line (it's the last day before services start again) and set off for Cheltenham, Kayte Lane.
Here we are passing through Greet tunnel, a gloomy tube with a bend in it, so you are mostly in pitch darkness as you cross through it:
In the picture above you can see such a dipped joint just before the front of the tamper. We got rid of it today, but they soon come back.
A return to Swanbourne
In the summer of 2020 we recovered the diamond pattern edging blocks from Swanbourne, on the re-opening East-West rail link. We also recovered a quantity of bricks from nearby Verney Junction.
Recovery team member Jim had a look at how the two sites have developed, so here are some old and new pictures from yours truly and Jim, taken more or less from the same camera locations.
Looking in the same direction in March 2022. Everything has gone, down to the last brick. Sadly our request for some of the slates from the roof of the stationmaster's house was not honoured. They were put aside for us, then all trace of them was lost. We never got them.
Looking east in 2022 - trees and platform gone. The country lane is now out in the open.
Then Verney Junction:
Looking west in 2022, the site is cleared and a new accommodation bridge is being built in the background.
The stationmaster's house here has survived, and a screen is being built to deflect the noise of the future passing trains.
It's odd that this seems to be rarely done for motorways, where noise is constant, rather than occasional, as along a railway line.
Looking east in October 2020. Not a lot to see, as the station was behind the camera. The grass strip on the right was once the start of a curve to the right, which led to Quainton Road.
Looking on the bright side, it's good to see a railway being revived. Now for Stratford - Honeybourne!
Here's a lovely picture of 4270 just passing the new canopy and its big hexagonal lantern:
Picture by John Fancote, with thanks. |
It didn't take long, the new heritage canopy has had a modern security camera added to it:
Will it affect our chances in the next HRA awards?Tuesday at Toddington.
We've had a supply of these Ovoids delivered to Toddington.
Funny things, Ovoids. They are made of pressed dust, as you can see in this close up. They did not do well on our re-opening day, and the two locos concerned really struggled for steam, one having to be rescued. We need British steam coal - with the Russian crisis and energy shortfalls, maybe re-think the prohibition of the proposed coal mine last year?
A snapshot from the workshop - our loco dept. is making a valuable contribution off site (to LMS in Loughborough) by machining parts for 76077.
How do you turn this 'pill' into a crankpin nut? As a sculptor once said, 'take away everything that doesn't look like a crankpin nut'!
Note also the little bag with some brass rollers.... these are actually for the big sliding window of the Usk hut. Another good example of one department being friendly, and helping another.
Tuesday morning saw the two service locos leave the yard (via the now functioning yard throat/main line points) and this is the second, Foremarke Hall. Two race trains are waiting in the station, with happy punters being brought by car and by coach.
Back in the yard a reserve loco was in light steam - 35006 P&O, with her favourite food - two wagons of best Shotton Coal. For not much longer though.
Dinmore Manor took out the first train. The day was sunny, but from a 0 degree start, so there was still plenty of cold in the air.
With the regulator almost closed (not too fast to pick up the token from the box) Dinmore Manor chugged by modestly, with the 'At The Races' headboard on the front. Once out of station limits (approaching Didbrook) the Manor became much louder, and with its smallish wheels the loco could be heard blasting away vigourously from the mess room balcony almost all the way to Winchcombe.
Stirring stuff.
Wednesday with the Usketeers.
What a wash out! It rained non stop all day. Such a shame for the race goers. Luckily the trains were nonetheless packed, and a steamy atmosphere inside suggested that fun was being had. Mrs. Blogger was in there serving drinks. She sounded tired....
During the morning we filmed both race trains going non-stop through the station, and here are the links:
Dinmore Manor through Winchcombe
During the first half hour it was damp but dry, and we spent some time moving Maxie the mixer to a more level site. We've had a lot of trouble from Maxie recently - she will only start and run if the attitude is just so. Well, we said she had a bad attitude! And that attitude seems to evolve, sometimes it's like this, then later on, like that. It's a fuel issue, but where? Eventually we got her going, but after a few minutes and your back is turned, she'll just stop. Grrr!
Today we carried on with the same corner as last time. Dave was back, so that gave two block layers on the go. Dave did the front, and Paul backed up the rear. That 6 inch block is about to go into the gap on the right with the mortar in it. By now it as already spitting, hence the hood.
We were very happy to see Neal, who brought with him the former he had made for the arch over the big window. That's another big step forward. Unfortunately the laying in of the arch itself couldn't take place because of the increasing rain, which just liquefies the mortar.
Neal with the arch former - isn't it big! |
Here is the arch former in place on the inner side, with a test brick on the end. The arch will be two bricks wide.
Neal also fitted a second, much thinner former on to the front. The two will then cover the whole of the underneath of the arch, and enable us to lay bricks in an alternating pattern, to lock front and back rings together.
On completion of the joinery, Neal laid a waterproof membrane on top. This will stay, after being cut to size. In the interim it protects the plywood in the formers from rain damage, much needed today.
Just before lunch we lifted on another quoin on to the corner here. We also managed to lock it in with the buttress blocks we laid last week, so that these are supported right up to the corner now.
We broke for lunch, hoping for some relief from the rain afterwards. No such luck, it only got worse.
Here you can see Paul wading around in almost an inch of water inside.
Dismantling the trestle supports had to be done in sopping clothing, with the hood up, but we still got a smile from Dave.
Finally, a parting shot as we ran for our cars. The sample truss we kept from the original building has been placed against the southern wall, together with the new lintel for the small window here. That's another thing we were going to place today, but it wasn't possible in the pouring rain, which would wash all the mortar away.
We're going to bring the second lintel next week, so might end up placing both at once. The weather looks a lot better already.
Before we close, a bit of contact with former steam colleagues in Rotterdam (who run main line excursions with 2500HP Pacific 01.1075) suggests that they use Colombian coal now. They fitted a restrictor ring to the blast pipe, and she steams like the devil now, they say.
But Colombia... that is over 5200 miles away, how much greener is that than a small coalmine in Cumbria?
Need a self service coal mine in South Wales.
ReplyDeleteDon't start me on Green Issues please Jo - all our Politicians are doing is Exporting the Problem elsewhere and of course we should mine our own coal - only an idiot would try to justify bringing it from halfway across the world!
ReplyDeleteWell done on a wonderful blog incidentally, although today's film of Winchcombe reminded me how little importance was given to Heritage until Very Recently. I positively hate the bridge and the up platform building, what a pity it was not done properly? I feel sure there is no atmosphere of the old station at all sadly!
ReplyDeleteWell perhaps, but you should have seen Winchcombe Station in 1984! Exactly, it had gone! Personally, I think Winchcombe Station looks better now than it did when it was first built and, of course, the "Usk Hut" will add to the overall scene.
DeleteGreat blog again and fantastic progress. I have always been impressed with the work that you all do on the railway, especially Broadway, but never felt the need to comment. The careful planning and eye for detail is impressive and the completed station buildings, canopy and footbridge looks spot on. Brilliant.
ReplyDeleteAnd then you attach a security camera on the end with zero thought and the whole illusion of a period railway station is ruined.
With a tiny bit of imagination, surely a security camera can be hidden out of view.
...or at the very least, be given a coat of Light Stone. To be fair, it doesn't sound like the Broadway team had any kind of say in the matter.
DeleteThat is correct.
DeleteJo, it was good to meet you and the 'removal men' at my friend's house last week when you retrieved the lamp post.
ReplyDeleteThat canopy is a tribute to the team and looks fantastic.
However, I would have thought that the security camera could be mounted more discreetly.
That has compromised the overall effect that all the Broadway volunteers have strive to create.
I am glad I took a photo of the end of the canopy before the camera was installed.
Security camera on roof extension - That gentlemen ( directors) is an act of vandalism!
ReplyDeleteIt puts me in mind of the lack of Victorian/Edwardian picture rails in the rooms at Broadway. Despite offering to pay for them, I was told they were a dust trap.
Broadway is the jewel in the GWSR crown.
But some people just don't get "tradition and the living railway museum."
Wish i had known you were up my way at Bentley Heath ,would have brought some bacon Rolls for you . I know the houses by the Level Crossing as my daughter had a school friend who lived in the middle cottage .
ReplyDeleteNever noticed the lamp in the garden before , lack of Heritage vision , but it's a great place to watch the Shakespeare Express , but I missed the Flying Scotsman last Sunday .
Does John Fancote live near me I wonder ? john M .
Unfortunately, in these days, people cannot be trusted to leave things that don't concern them alone; hence the security camera. Also, one has to remember that it has to be in a reasonably easy to access place for maintenance/ replacement. Such is life. Maybe it could be disguised.
ReplyDeleteTo happier things: A great retrieval of the lamp post at Birmingham. Also great pics/vids of the race trains. I must say that the B&W picture of 4270 passing the Broadway canopy is very atmospheric.
Shame about the weather on Wednesday for work on the Usk hut, but as my better half always says, "It's only March". She says this throughout the year with adjustment for the relative month.
Regards, Paul.
I echo the comments above about the security camera. My heart sank when I glanced at the footbridge webcam on Wednesday to see a technician unreeling metres of WHITE cable. I hope that the cable is not as visible as the camera itself if under the canopy. When you think that Neal carefully placed metal conduit as pretend gas piping to hide the wiring to the lantern, it will be a great pity if white cable is cable-tied to the metalwork for the CCTV. There must surely be a better place for this camera - if it is needed at all, and a bit of thought could have boxed it to look like something less obtrusive. For example, a much smaller camera peeking through a hole in the canopy end woodwork, covered by a wooden box painted light stone... Disappointed that all that careful and skillful work is blighted by such carelessness.
ReplyDeleteInside the canopy, in a box, looking out through a hole, if you absolutely must have an expensive security camera system. But Broadway is not a high crime area, and to my knowledge there has been nothing to cause alarm since we opened.
DeleteHello Jo, as with Peter and Paul about the camera, we were appalled to see the camera being fitted that day, Marion told me to watch my blood presure and write to the directors about it which I will do. Absolute act of vandalism!Who do we write to please? All the hard work done to get it right spoilt in less than an hour...........
ReplyDeleteAny ways the picture of 4270, wow! can I copy that and print it it off please,
I know I said in an earlier blog all we needed was a picture like that but to actualy see it on the blog we both looked at that said we should ask for the next in the series to see (cab of 4270 in view , lots of steam and the station master, in Edwardian uniform, is speaking to the driver) Can we wish???
Thanks again Jo hoping to see you soon.
Regards
Paul & Marion
The copyright of the 4270 picture is John Fancote's.
DeleteYou can contact the company through the website.
Looking forward to seeing you!
Hi Jo,
ReplyDeleteSpeaking of pictures, could the photographer who did the galloping horse be persuaded to recreate that marvellous Edwardian scene of passengers waiting for a train on the platform. A local Am Dram group perhaps in period clothing? And from that angle you wouldn't see that damn security camera.
Thanks for all the fabulous blogs.
Chris
That's our editor, and it's a good idea. I'll suggest it, next time I submit an article.
DeleteJo, suggest it as a Photo Shoot for members.
DeleteI would be interested in going to it.
A period photo shoot is an excellent idea. If you would like a 1904-1905 copy of "Punch" magazine, so that someone can read it while they wait for a train, I think I have some spare copies. I can give you one, free.
DeleteGreat Blog as usual Jo. Interesting video of the second train leaving Winchcombe it looks like a steam heat pipe let go with a bit of a bang just after the 5th or 6th coach passed under the bridge.
ReplyDeleteYes, a similar comment on the video itself steam heat, or something from the buffet car?
DeleteIf a steam heat pipe, would it not continue to blow?
Looking forward to paying a visit to see the magnificent job on the canopy extension Jo.
ReplyDeleteAs for that "security" camera - it brings to mind Prince Charles's comment about a monstrous carbuncle on the face of an old friend! It looks like a very amateur job. Far more discrete cameras are available at very little difference in cost. Those responsible should be told to visit Bewdley or Bridgnorth stations and look for the security cameras there. They'll have to look very hard and even then they probably won't spot all of them!
If I'm not mistaken, there was no security camera covering the northern section of the platform at Broadway before now. Why is a camera suddenly thought necessary? Has there been a sudden surge in crime at the northern end of the station?
ReplyDeleteIt does seem odd that there was apparently no communication between the Heritage team. and whoever decided to fit the camera.
You would think somebody would have contacted the Heritage team at an early stage and said, "We'd like to put a camera pointing north along the platform. Could you figure out a way of providing a discreet mounting for it?" Then it could have been built in from the start, in a way that would not compromise the finished job.
Unfortunately I think this kind of issue is the result of the loose structure of the GWSR. There's no overall management - just a collection of semi-autonomous groups, each doing their own thing, without necessarily any common purpose, and with little or no communication between them.
Sometimes this results in major fiascos - such as the way the Broadway station building and footbridge were placed in the wrong positions relative to each other, which is why the canopy couldn't be built exactly as original. And sometimes it results in relatively minor annoyances, like a modern security camera being plonked onto the beautifully recreated period-style canopy, without, apparently, any warning, discussion, or communication between the relevant people.
It might seem strange to say that the GWSR has no overall management. I just checked the Management Team page of the GWSR website, and there are no less than 49 people listed (directors, heads of departments, station masters) as managing the railway.
And yet, when we look at situations like this, the question has to be asked - why does counter-productive stuff just happen, out of the blue, with no communication between anyone? Shouldn't at least one of those 49 people have been aware and involved?
I'm tempted to say that a *real* railway would never be run in such a slack manner. But, of course, the GWSR is bolstered by volunteers and donations, so it doesn't need to be - can't be - quite as strictly controlled as a conventional business.
I do recognise that it's very difficult to manage a concern which relies on volunteers. You can't *tell* your staff what to do, you can only *ask* them. And if they say no, what are you going to do? Dock their pay? Sack them?
I had exactly this problem when I was a grass-roots live music promoter. There was never enough money to employ paid staff, so I relied very heavily on friends helping out, for a few beers or just for the fun of it. And that did make things incredibly difficult, because I could never simply tell my crew what to do, like a boss instructing his employees. I had to ask them nicely - and grin and bear it when they did the wrong thing, or ignored my plans and did their own thing. The human resources side of things was like walking on eggshells...
Unfortunately I don't think there's any easy solution for this kind of thing - although improving communications would be a good start.
The GWSR website tells me that the head of the security department is Peter Gough.
I must admit that until I looked at the website I didn't even know the GWSR had a security department. But apparently there is one, and presumably they're the people who festoon Broadway with cameras.
I'm willing to bet Peter Gough never spoke to the Heritage team at Broadway, and I'm also willing to bet the Heritage team never spoke to Peter Gough.
But perhaps it's time to have a chat...
Peter Gough can be contacted at "security@gwsr.com" I wrote the following, copied to Richard Johnson.
ReplyDeleteI am a shareholder and in view of the extreme criticism I would be most grateful if you could change the security camera on the recently built roof extension at Broadway. A more unobtrusive unit could be used. Thank you for your trouble.
This is the one sentence reply from Peter Gough quote :-
ReplyDelete"The cameras at Broadway are the same as originally fitted in exactly the same positions,except that the northern end has moved with the extended canopy."
That statement encapsulates the problems referred to by the many concerned supporters to this blog. Ask politely and see the response.
Exactly, and that sort of reply typifies the 'head in the sand' attitude of people who really should know better. In other words 'that's where it was before and that's where it's going to stay' Presumably this individual is answerable to nobody so does his own thing and to hell with what anyone else thinks. Maybe somebody with a more proactive approach would have done things differently. In the meantime a paint brush and some light stone paint would improve the 'carbunkle'? After all, it doesn't have to be white!
DeleteThe webcams at Broadway No.1 ( temp. US ? ) and No.2 are avidly monitored by me and probably many others. They provide good cover of the station so are additional CCTV cameras actually necessary? If there was a readily published number to call or text if something suspicious was seen then that would surely provide a 'security' overview.
ReplyDelete